<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Personal Revelations of the Magnificent Megan M. &#187; limitations</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/limitations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldmegan.net</link>
	<description>(worldmegan)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tautology: Tim Ferriss vs. The English Language</title>
		<link>http://worldmegan.net/2007/07/tautology-tim-ferriss-vs-the-english-language/</link>
		<comments>http://worldmegan.net/2007/07/tautology-tim-ferriss-vs-the-english-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Megan M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laziness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim ferriss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usual error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worldhacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldmegan.net/index.php/2007/07/tautology-tim-ferriss-vs-the-english-language/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Remember this: Would you like to rephrase that more positively? Yes, that.  Remember that?

	Tonight Tim Ferriss made a post regarding the ejection of certain words from one&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s vocabulary.  He suggests this for slightly different reasons than I originally discussed, but still interesting, still valid!  He takes familiar staples such as &#226;&#8364;&#732;should&#226;&#8364;&#8482; and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>	<p>Remember this: <a href="/index.php/2007/04/positivity-part-three/">Would you like to rephrase that more positively?</a> Yes, that.  Remember that?</p>

	<p><a href="http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/07/27/the-10-most-common-words-you-should-stop-using-now/">Tonight Tim Ferriss made a post regarding the ejection of certain words from one&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s vocabulary</a>.  He suggests this for slightly different reasons than I <a href="/index.php/2007/04/positivity-part-three/">originally discussed</a>, but still interesting, still valid!  He takes familiar staples such as &#226;&#8364;&#732;should&#226;&#8364;&#8482; and adds grand old warhorses such as &#226;&#8364;&#732;happiness&#226;&#8364;&#8482; and &#226;&#8364;&#732;success&#226;&#8364;&#8482; (and &#226;&#8364;&#732;good/right&#226;&#8364;&#8482; and &#226;&#8364;&#732;bad/wrong&#226;&#8364;&#8482;).  I happen to think he&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s <em>absolutely right.</em> And also, er, <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_%28rhetoric%29">absolutely correct</a>.</em></p>

	<p>Tim (who sometimes links multisyllabic words to their entries in Wikipedia as if to say, &#226;&#8364;&#732;Look at this cool word I know&#226;&#8364;&#8482;, which is exactly what I would do) suggests that the usage of words such as these does not require a lot of complex thought, which is why we have used them to the point of meaninglessness &#226;&#8364;&#8220; and might consider exercising our brains in order to find suitable alternatives that better describe the situation at hand.  We love them, he says:</p>

	<p><blockquote>Because they remove the heavy lifting of real thinking. These socially-accepted throwaway terms are crutches for unclear thinking, just like &#226;&#8364;&#339;thing&#226;&#8364;, &#226;&#8364;&#339;stuff&#226;&#8364;, or &#226;&#8364;&#339;interesting&#226;&#8364;&#226;&#8364;&#8220;enemies of good writers worldwide.</blockquote></p>

	<p>If you stop for a moment and think about it&#226;&#8364;&#166; there are quite a few words that are likewise <em>easy</em> to use.  I sure as hell use them!  Perhaps we should all spend our next date night with a raspberry merlot and a thesaurus&#226;&#8364;&#166;</p>

	<p>Should.  You know, scouring this entry for instances of Tim&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s outlawed words is a pain in the ass, this late at night.  (And &#226;&#8364;&#732;should&#226;&#8364;&#8482; was the one I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;d ditched already!)  But I still think he&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s got a point.  I definitely see the weakness in myself, and it sounds like an interesting challenge &#226;&#8364;&#8220; especially since half the words he listed are words I use <em>over and over and over</em>.  And over.</p>

	<p>Sounds like rather a fun game, actually.  Want to play?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://worldmegan.net/2007/07/tautology-tim-ferriss-vs-the-english-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
